As the job cycle begins anew, I've got one eye on the pseudology jobs, just in case I see a good one to go for. There are a few out there, so I'm keeping my CV updated and dusting off my Interfolio account. And of course, I need to keep my letters of reference current. That led to calling most of my letter-writers today just to "make sure that they got the link." While talking with Dr. Whirlwind, zi of the impressive CV, zi said in a slightly lowered tone of voice – which I heard as "Heed what I say now" – that I needed to get serious about putting out some journal articles. (I don't have any in a major journal.) Even with the book manuscript that I hope will someday soon be under contract, zi said that all the book could do was buy me some time; one way or another, I have to apply myself to getting some articles out.
In pseudology, at least, it can take years to get an article into print, so this process could take every bit as long as bringing my book to print. Whirlwind's suggestion was to take a few of my drafted book chapters and re-work them to play around with theory – almost as experiments, really – and send them out. And, as absurd as it sounded to me, zi recommended putting them on my CV as soon as I send them out as "submitted." This sounds odd, but it corresponds with Flavia's advice to me to play up everything that I can at this stage of my career, when I literally have nothing significant in publication and need to demonstrate somehow that I can be taken seriously.
Of course, Whirlwind is speaking to me from the vantage point of a very ambitious researcher who has achieved hir goal of full professorship at a bona fide R1 institution. As I have mentioned before, I have my doubts that I want to follow that exact career path as an academic. But I don't doubt that even crunchy-granola liberal arts colleges will take the liberty in this godawful job market of judging job candidates partly on their publication credits. Journal articles have been literally the last thing on my mind within my recent professional development, and I guess that I have to stop letting that slide.
Good thing I'm about to start attending a writing group with some colleagues tomorrow. We'll see what hours of caffeine and fear of public shame will do for my productivity on a Saturday.
In pseudology, at least, it can take years to get an article into print, so this process could take every bit as long as bringing my book to print. Whirlwind's suggestion was to take a few of my drafted book chapters and re-work them to play around with theory – almost as experiments, really – and send them out. And, as absurd as it sounded to me, zi recommended putting them on my CV as soon as I send them out as "submitted." This sounds odd, but it corresponds with Flavia's advice to me to play up everything that I can at this stage of my career, when I literally have nothing significant in publication and need to demonstrate somehow that I can be taken seriously.
Of course, Whirlwind is speaking to me from the vantage point of a very ambitious researcher who has achieved hir goal of full professorship at a bona fide R1 institution. As I have mentioned before, I have my doubts that I want to follow that exact career path as an academic. But I don't doubt that even crunchy-granola liberal arts colleges will take the liberty in this godawful job market of judging job candidates partly on their publication credits. Journal articles have been literally the last thing on my mind within my recent professional development, and I guess that I have to stop letting that slide.
Good thing I'm about to start attending a writing group with some colleagues tomorrow. We'll see what hours of caffeine and fear of public shame will do for my productivity on a Saturday.