I just had a telephone interview for a tenure-track job. The job that I thought wasn't tenure-track, until I asked in the interview. I was going to cut it all short by saying I'd just been hired by CBU, and then they clarified that the contract-sounding job was actually tenure-track. Good heavens.
My head is kind of spinning. My short take is that this job is not for me, since, if nothing else, they made it clear during the conversation that they want a pseudologist who specializes in Fishing Whoppers, and I am very clearly not trained at all in that. (I've always been a specialist in Damn Lies, if you're interested.) It's also at a religiously affiliated school, which is not my favorite thing, although at least the affiliation is something I think I could live with. And, to my dismay, the new hire would be asked to work extensively on developing online courses. I find this horrifying, although of course I offered much more measured concern about the pedagogical value of such for pseudology. I was a little surprised to hear that the interviewer largely agreed with me: zi let it be known between the lines that this was being forced upon the department by the money-minded administration, and they had to make the best of it. The most ridiculous thing, which was definitely not clear in the job posting, is that the position is primarily for someone who would develop course for an online master's program in Fishing Whoppers.
Why the fuck are they even talking to me!?
So, questions:
*deeply confused*My head is kind of spinning. My short take is that this job is not for me, since, if nothing else, they made it clear during the conversation that they want a pseudologist who specializes in Fishing Whoppers, and I am very clearly not trained at all in that. (I've always been a specialist in Damn Lies, if you're interested.) It's also at a religiously affiliated school, which is not my favorite thing, although at least the affiliation is something I think I could live with. And, to my dismay, the new hire would be asked to work extensively on developing online courses. I find this horrifying, although of course I offered much more measured concern about the pedagogical value of such for pseudology. I was a little surprised to hear that the interviewer largely agreed with me: zi let it be known between the lines that this was being forced upon the department by the money-minded administration, and they had to make the best of it. The most ridiculous thing, which was definitely not clear in the job posting, is that the position is primarily for someone who would develop course for an online master's program in Fishing Whoppers.
Why the fuck are they even talking to me!?
So, questions:
- Unless these people are total idiots, or are completely out of other options (not bloody likely), I shouldn't be hired. I simply would not serve the purpose, if only because I am essentially ignorant of Fishing Whoppers. And jeez, I know lots of colleagues who are experts in Fishing Whoppers and need jobs — why isn't this school going for those obvious candidates?
- But if for some reason I advance in my candidacy, should I even proceed, or withdraw myself respectfully? Wouldn't I be setting myself up for failure if I somehow ended up with a job creating online courses in Fishing Whoppers?
- Something about all of this doesn't make sense. A t-t job in a big subfield of pseudology, with a distasteful pedagogical slant, conducting its phone interviews in late April? With a job posting so vague and uninformative that I applied to it even though I literally couldn't do the job? What the hell is going on?